 |
California Women Artists Unveiled:
“A Woman’s View”
 |
|
Donna Norine Schuster
(1883 1953)
Girl with Mirror
Oil on canvas 26" x 20"
|
by Elaine Adams
Exploring new styles, expressing unconventional thoughts, experiencing
great adventures — these are some of the traits that can keep today’s
woman vital, exciting, and in demand at fashionable parties. Yet, throughout
much of history women who exhibited these interests were often shunned
for displaying what the public perceived as unladylike behavior. Prime
career opportunities were not typically given to women who expressed ambitions
other than homemaking. Motivated women felt forced to hide behind the
scene — “behind every great man...” — or to conceal themselves under male
pseudonyms. Many professional women artists of the late nineteenth or
early twentieth centuries never married, or if they did marry, they rarely
had children, as so much of their lives were purely devoted to creating
art.
The Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts, established in 1805, was among
the first institutions in the world to provide women the opportunity to
train as artists, although mostly as “copyists.” A copyist was one who
reproduced works by popular artists to satisfy a market demand for buyers
who could not afford the originals. This was an occupation that was considered
perfectly respectable for women of the nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries.
Many American women opted to study at the more progressive Art Students
League of New York. With its renowned list of instructors, including William
Merritt Chase (1848-1916), Thomas Eakins (1844-1916) and Augustus Saint-Gaudens
(1848-1907), the school soon boasted 1,000 students and became arguably
the most important American art school at the turn of the twentieth century.
Another popular training ground for aspiring women artists was the Art
Institute of Chicago. The Art Institute was recognized for having excellent
instruction and the country’s largest collection of plaster casts, essentially
used for the study of academic drawing.
On the west coast the only nationally recognized influential art school
was the San Francisco Art Association (after 1907 the name was changed
to the San Francisco Institute of Art). Following the death of the school’s
first director, the illustrious Virgil Williams (1860-1945), Arthur Mathews(1860-1945)
became director and served from 1890 to 1 9 06. Mathews’ tonalist and
highly decorative style influenced an entire generation of California
painters, including several women artists, such as Mary De Neale Morgan
(1868-1948) and E. Charlton Fortune (1885-1969). What set Mathews apart
from most instructors of the day was that he was willing to teach life
drawing classes to women, a practice that was generally forbidden since
students were required to study nude male bodies. American art schools
aside, every artist of the time knew that to be considered truly “professional,”
it was advantageous to have studied in Europe, especially in Paris. This
great city host ed a thriving community of American artists who found
inspiration in the Paris of La Belle Epoque. Visiting artists also enjoyed
the luxury of studying the abundance of paintings and sculptures by great
masters displayed throughout local museums and cathedrals. It was common
to see women with their sketch pads and easels lined up along the great
halls of the Louvre Gallery copying the works of distinguished artists.
|